Skip to content
Career & Applications

What belongs in the cover letter, and what belongs on the CV

Sent together, the two documents usually say the same thing twice. The division of labour is straightforward once you notice that they answer different questions — and that only one of them gets stored, forwarded and read again in three weeks.

8 min read·Published 27 Sept 2026·Europass CV Maker · Editorial policy

Most cover letters are a summary of the CV written in longer sentences. That is understandable — both documents get finished on the same evening, against the same advert, by someone who has run out of patience — and it wastes the only document in the application that can say something the CV structurally cannot.

The split is not a matter of taste. The two files are read at different moments, by different people, and often only one of them survives the journey. Working out which content depends on being read alongside the other, and which has to stand alone, settles most of the decisions on its own.

This article is about the division of labour when you are sending both. Whether to send one at all is a separate question, and our UK format guide answers it; what to change for each advert is the tailoring question, which the main CV guide owns.

The two documents answer different questions

A CV answers "what has this person done, and at what level". It is a record: reverse-chronological, scannable, and designed to be read out of order by someone who starts in the middle of page one.

A letter answers "why this role, why this employer, and why now". None of those three questions has a place on a CV, because a CV is the same document for every application and those answers are not.

The test for a paragraph is whether it would survive being sent to a different employer. If it would, it is CV material and the CV is already carrying it. If it would look absurd addressed to anyone else, it belongs in the letter, and it is the reason the letter exists.

This is why "I am a hard-working and detail-oriented professional seeking a new challenge" is not a cover letter opening. It is addressed to nobody and could be sent anywhere.

The overlap that writes itself

There is a specific, predictable collision between the CV summary and the first paragraph of the letter. Both are written last, both are written from the advert, and both are attempting to position you for the role. Left alone, they converge to the point of near-identical wording, and the reader meets the same three facts twice before reaching anything new.

The person least able to spot this is the person who wrote both, for the reason set out in our piece on a CV repeating itself: rereading your own writing checks the meaning and skips the wording. Open the two files side by side and read only the CV summary and the letter opening, one after the other. The duplication is obvious in five seconds and invisible for weeks otherwise.

Weak

I am an experienced project manager with eight years of delivery experience across public sector programmes, skilled in stakeholder management and agile methods, as detailed in my attached CV.

Stronger

I have spent the last three years delivering programmes inside local authorities, which is why the line in your advert about running delivery through a committee cycle is the part I want to talk about: it is the constraint most delivery plans are written as though it does not exist.

The first paragraph is the CV summary in prose, plus a sentence telling the reader to go and read the CV. The second could not be sent to any other employer, and it commits to a view about the work, which gives the interviewer something to open with.

What only the letter can carry

These are the things a CV cannot say, either because they are specific to one employer or because a record of what you have done has no natural place to put them.

  • Why this employer, specifically — the part of what they do that you have an actual opinion about, not a compliment copied from their homepage.
  • The explanation for something the CV makes look odd: a sideways move, a short role, a relocation, a gap, a return after time out, a change of field.
  • The requirement you meet by an unusual route. If the advert asks for five years in a sector and you have three plus two years in a closely related one, the CV shows the dates and the letter makes the case.
  • Which part of the job you want more of. A CV describes what you were given to do; a letter can say which of it you would choose.
  • Logistics that affect a decision: notice period, availability, willingness to relocate, whether you can work the shift pattern the advert names.
  • A named referral. "Your senior engineer suggested I apply after we met at the accessibility meetup in March" is a fact worth stating, and there is nowhere on a CV to put it.
One achievement may legitimately appear in both documents — but only if the letter is explaining why that particular one matters for this employer. Repeating it without adding the reason is where the duplication starts.

What should never leave the CV

The strongest practical argument for the split is that the letter is the file most likely to go missing. Applications get forwarded as attachments, pasted into forms, printed for a panel, or entered into a system by someone who takes the CV and nothing else. The CV is the document that gets stored, circulated and read again three weeks later when someone asks "who was the one with the migration experience?".

So everything a decision depends on stays on the CV, even where the letter also mentions it: employers, job titles, full dates, qualifications, registrations, the evidence of scope, the tools and systems. A CV that only makes sense with the letter beside it is a CV that will be read without it.

  • If a fact would be missed by a reader who never opens the letter, it belongs on the CV.
  • If a fact is in the letter only, assume it has not been read.
  • If the letter contradicts the CV — a different end date, a different job title — the CV is the version that will be checked, and the difference is the thing that gets noticed.

A method that takes about ten minutes

Write the CV first, then let it tell you what the letter is for. Writing them in the other order is how the letter ends up as a narration.

  1. Finish the CV for this advert. Do not write a word of the letter yet.
  2. Read the CV as a stranger would, in order, and note every point where you would ask "why?" — why that move, why that gap, why this job now. Those questions are the letter's agenda.
  3. Write three or four short paragraphs answering only those questions, plus the one thing you have an opinion about in the advert.
  4. Reread the CV summary and the letter opening consecutively. If they make the same point, rewrite the letter opening, not the summary.
  5. Check that no fact exists only in the letter. Anything that does either moves to the CV or is acknowledged as optional.
  6. Keep a copy of both, noting which advert they went to. When someone rings about it, you will want to know what they read.

When there is no letter, only a box

Plenty of application forms have no attachment field for a letter, just a text area labelled "supporting statement" or "anything else you would like us to know". Pasting a formatted letter into it produces a wall of text with a date and an address at the top, which is worse than writing for the box.

Write for the box instead: drop the letterhead conventions, keep the same content, and use short paragraphs. Where the form asks you to address numbered criteria, answer them in the order the form lists them rather than in the order you find most flattering — someone is scoring them in that order.

And check what the form does to your text before submitting. Line breaks and bullet characters pasted from a word processor sometimes arrive as one continuous paragraph, which is a formatting problem you can see and fix in the preview if you look.

Questions

Does anyone actually read cover letters?
Honestly, it varies, and we have no data of our own on it — so treat any confident percentage you read on this subject with suspicion. The practical position: when a letter is asked for, its absence is a reason to discard an application, so send one. For a direct application to a named person, a short specific letter is the cheapest way to say something a form cannot hold. For a high-volume portal application, it is less likely to be the thing that decides anything, and a long one is not more likely to be read than a short one.
Should the letter repeat my best achievement?
Once, at most, and only when the letter is explaining why that achievement matters to this particular employer. If the sentence in the letter is the CV bullet with the numbers taken out, delete it and use the space for something the CV cannot say.
How long should the letter be?
Three or four short paragraphs, on one side. If it fills a page, it is almost certainly narrating the CV, and the way to shorten it is to delete everything the CV already establishes rather than to compress the wording.
What if the advert gives me nothing to have an opinion about?
Then say something true about the work instead of manufacturing enthusiasm for the employer. A sentence about the part of the role you expect to be hardest, or the constraint you have dealt with before, is more useful to a reader than praise for a company you have only read about — and it cannot be sent to anyone else, which was the test.

The full guide

This article covers one decision. These cover the whole subject.

Worked examples by role

Put this into practice

The editor keeps your CV as structured content, so the decisions in this article are easy to apply and easy to change again.

Europass CV Maker is an independent CV-building service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Europass or the European Commission.