How to Make an ATS-Friendly CV
4 min read·Updated 5 Nov 2025
There is more nonsense written about applicant tracking systems than about any other part of job hunting. You will read that they reject CVs automatically, that they score you out of a hundred, that you must use a specific font, and that white text stuffed with keywords will get you through. None of that is a useful description of what actually happens.
What an ATS mostly does is parse your file into structured fields — name, contact details, employment history with dates, education, skills — and store it so a recruiter can search across applicants. Some systems rank candidates against criteria a recruiter has set. Almost none reject applications without a human involved.
So the real risk is not rejection by algorithm. It is that your CV parses badly, your employment history ends up mangled, and a recruiter searching for the skill you have does not find you.
The four failures that actually matter
In practice, parsing goes wrong in a small number of specific ways:
- Multiple columns. A parser reads left to right across the page. With two columns it can interleave your job title from the left with a skill from the right, producing nonsense. This is the single most common cause of a badly parsed CV.
- Content in headers and footers. Many parsers discard these regions. Contact details in a header is the classic version of this mistake, and it means a recruiter cannot contact you.
- Text inside images, text boxes or graphics. A skills chart, a logo containing your name, a profile rendered as a graphic — all invisible to the parser and to a screen reader.
- Tables used for layout. Some parsers handle them, some flatten them into unreadable sequences. There is no way to know which system will receive your file.
Myths worth ignoring
- "You must use Arial or Times New Roman." Any embedded, standard font parses fine. What matters is that the PDF contains real text, not that the typeface is from 1995.
- "Never use a PDF." PDFs have parsed correctly for well over a decade. Send a PDF unless the application explicitly asks for a Word document.
- "Keyword stuffing in white text works." It is detected, and it is treated as deception when a human opens the file. Which they will.
- "You get scored out of 100 and rejected below a threshold." Some systems produce a match score for the recruiter. It is a sorting aid, not an automatic gate.
- "Never use bullet points." Standard bullet characters parse fine. Unusual glyphs and emoji sometimes do not.
What to do instead
- Use a single column for the whole document.
- Put your contact details in the body of the page, at the top, not in a header.
- Use conventional section headings: "Work Experience", "Education", "Skills". A parser looks for these exact kinds of words. "Where I have been" is charming and unparseable.
- Write dates in a consistent, unambiguous format — "March 2022 – Present" throughout, not a mix of formats.
- Keep the job title, employer and dates on separate, clearly structured lines rather than run together in a sentence.
- Export as a PDF with embedded fonts and selectable text. Open it afterwards and try to select the text with your cursor: if you cannot, neither can the parser.
- Include the exact terms the advert uses, where they are true of you. If it says "stakeholder management", use that phrase rather than a synonym.
The selectable-text test
This takes ten seconds and catches most serious problems. Open your exported PDF, select all, and copy. Paste into a plain text editor.
If your name, phone number, job titles and dates all appear in a sensible order, your CV will parse. If the text comes out interleaved, in the wrong order, or missing entirely, you have found the problem before an employer did.
When a designed CV is fine
Not every application goes through a tracking system. Small companies, direct applications to a named hiring manager, referrals, agencies that work from email, and most creative roles never involve one.
Keeping two versions is a reasonable strategy: a strict single-column version for portals, and a designed version for direct applications. What is not reasonable is using a two-column design for a large employer's portal and hoping.
Questions
Should I include a skills section just for the ATS?
Does file name matter?
What about the tables in my education section?
Put this into practice
The editor keeps your CV as structured content, so the section order and wording decisions in this guide are easy to apply and easy to change again.